In the resulting image, we can see that the image was captured with a slight delay, with the model already a step closer to the camera. In this sample scene, the camera was triggered as the model passed the wall to the right in the frame. The edge acutance is measured on the four edges of the Dead Leaves chart, and the shooting time is measured on the LED Universal Timer. On this scenario, the backlit panels in the scene are set up to simulate a fairly high dynamic range: the luminance ratio between the brightest point and a 18% reflective gray patch is 7, which we denote by a Exposure Value difference of 7. All pictures were taken at 100Lux with TL84 illuminant, 500ms after the defocus. This graph illustrates focus accuracy and speed and also zero shutter lag capability by showing the edge acutance versus the shooting time measured on the AFHDR setup on a series of pictures. However, there was a noticeable delay between pressing the shutter button and the image being captured, which meant it was easy to miss the decisive moment in a moving scene. It did a great job at focusing on the subject, with only very few AF failures. In our tests, the Edge 40 Pro’s autofocus showed a lot of light, but also some shade. Focus accuracy is also evaluated in all the real-life images taken, from infinity to close-up objects and in low light to outdoor conditions. Even if a shallow depth of field can be pleasant for a single subject portrait or close-up shot, it can also be a problem in some specific conditions such as group portraits Both situations are tested. It includes focusing speed and the capability of the device to capture images at the right time, what is called 'zero shutter lag' capability. Shooting delay is the difference between the time the user presses the capture button and the time the image is actually taken. Please contact us on how to receive a full report.Īutofocus tests concentrate on focus accuracy, focus repeatability, shooting time delay, and depth of field. Full performance evaluations are available upon request. The following section gathers key elements of DXOMARK’s exhaustive tests and analyses. More details on smartphone camera scores are available here. For more information about the DXOMARK Camera protocol, click here. Photo, Zoom, and Video quality are scored separately and then combined into an Overall score for comparison among the cameras in different devices. Testing a smartphone involves a team of engineers and technicians for about a week. The scores rely on objective tests for which the results are calculated directly by measurement software on our laboratory setups, and on perceptual tests in which a sophisticated set of metrics allow a panel of image experts to compare aspects of image quality that require human judgment. Motorola Edge 40 Pro – Natural overall image rendering, high levels of detail Test summaryĪbout DXOMARK Camera tests: DXOMARK’s Camera evaluations take place in laboratories and in real-world situations using a wide variety of subjects. The ultra-wide camera did better, though, offering a wide (14mm) field of view and overall pleasant image quality. However, when zooming in to 70mm equivalent, there was a noticeable drop in image quality, and at 100mm and longer focal lengths, images were pretty much unusable. With its dedicated tele lens offering a 50mm equivalent focal length, results were pretty good around a 2x zoom factor, despite some noticeable image noise. Our testers found zoom to be the area where the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has most potential for improvement. When moving while recording, video stabilization was not always effective, resulting in more noticeable camera shake than on the best-in-class devices. Temporal noise was well under control with fairly static scenes. Video footage offered accurate exposure and white balance, as well as acceptable levels of detail (albeit with some slight oversharpening). In video, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro ranks below the very best devices in its class, generally allowing the user to record high quality video clips in fairly static scenes. However, our testers observed some contrast issues in challenging high-contrast scenes, which could result in clipping and tone compression. ![]() The autofocus did its job swiftly and accurately in bright light, and the camera generally produced a good texture/noise trade-off. When shooting still images, subject exposure and white balance were nice in most test conditions, especially in low light and night shots. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro delivered a good performance across most areas of our image quality tests. Frequent fusion artifacts, hue shift effects around clipped areas.Unnatural contrast on faces in high-contrast scenes. ![]() Noise in bright light, especially in blue skies.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |